|
|
Introduction
& Prolog
|
Part 1.
Metabolic Metaphysics
|
Part 2.
Star Larvae
|
Part 3.
Space Brains
|
Addenda
|
Epilog
|
Silicon and Biogenesis
Atoms
are star spores. Biological life is cosmic, not terrestrial, in origin
and scope.
Explaining
life's origins remains a conundrum. Assertions fly. And theologians,
scientists, and school boards are likely to continue debating the issue
for some time. Whatever the outcome of their disputations, this much
is certain: If the universe spent its first moments as a ball of dense
radiation, then it could not have harbored life from the beginning. The
first biological cells arose at some time and at some place.
According
to the standard Big Bang cosmology, the primordial radiation cooled as
it expanded, and subatomic particles condensed from the cooling radiation.
This original supply of particles, under the influence of gravity, organized
itself into diffuse bodies, or clouds, at various places in the developing
universe. As each particle cloud grew more massive, it condensed faster,
under the influence of its own growing gravity. Eventually, pressures
in the dense centers of these clouds ignited nuclear reactions, and the
first generation of stars was born. These original stars manufactured,
as each generation continues to do, the various species of atoms that
are needed to construct planets, moons, comets, and the other components
of solar systems. Nature uses an assortment of atoms in her manufacturing
processes: ordinary metals; radioactive metals; inert gasses; and the
biologically significant elements carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen.
Nature's
atomic widgets at some point got assembled into simple molecules, organic
macromolecules, and ultimately into the first viruses and bacteria. Where
and how did this precise engineering occur? And does it continue to occur?
"In
our first paper referring obliquely to biology entitled "Primitive
grain clumps and organic compounds in carbonaceous chondrites" (Nature 264, 45-46, 1976) we wrote:
'The
formation of simple amino acids (e.g., glycine) is expected to
take place in dense molecular clouds which may well be the cradle
of life.'
Even
such a tentative proposition was regarded as outrageous heresy
in 1976, although now in 2004 it is regarded as obvious."
— Chandra
Wickramasinghe
A
Journey With Fred Hoyle
The prevailing
scientific assumption is that atoms and simple molecules first got assembled
into macromolecules and cells somewhere on the surface, or near the deep-sea
vents, of the early Earth. Attempts to recreate the chemical, thermal,
and other conditions that characterized the Earth after it cooled have
been made in various laboratory experiments. The pursuit of the chemical
path that led to the first cell has left behind a legacy of inconclusive
results, in which mixtures of simple molecules, such as methane, ammonia,
carbon dioxide, and water, reacting chemically under the influence of
electric sparks or other energy sources, have produced various consistencies
of organic sludge. The experiments have been modified in various ways,
as scientists have tried to produce a promising result. But the process
by which living cells arose, or could arise, from nonliving material remains
mysterious.
However,
the simple observation that material moves through the galaxy—pushed
by stellar winds and carried by comets and by the circulatory effects
of the galaxy’s own rotation—means that geocentric assumptions
can be set aside, and investigators can cast their nets almost anywhere
in search of conditions favorable to the manufacturing of
biological cells. There is no shortage of means by which viruses
and bacteria could be transported to Earth and other planets. And
no shortage of extremophile
organisms that thrive in conditions once thought inhospitable to life.
(Even
the species of stars include extremophiles.)
The manufacturing
of molecular-scale devices in industry is called nanotechnology.
The search for the origins of biological life should focus on finding
conditions conducive to a natural nanotechnology—that
is, material conditions conducive to manufacturing amino and nucleic
acids and then assembling them into viruses and bacteria. In other words,
researchers should be looking for real estate equipped with an infrastructure
that would support cell factories.
Silicon and Carbon:
Chemical Cousins
The physical
and chemical conditions inside stellar nebulae—the clouds of gas
and dust from which stars and their planets condense—would seem
to be more conducive to hosting a natural cell factory than would conditions
on the surface of a freshly minted planet. The energetically dynamic
environment of an embryonic solar system seems to be ideally suited
to deliver life. And the element silicon seems ideally suited to play
the role of midwife.
Silicon,
like carbon, has a habit of bonding chemically with its own kind. This
habit produces parallel macroscopic forms of the two elements. For example,
silicon and carbon both form three-dimensional crystals: carbon as diamond
and the so-called buckeyballs or fullerenes and silicon as varieties of
familiar mineral crystals, or silicates, including precious stones and
clays,
along with, under intelligent design, the circuitry of the electronics
industry. Packed less tightly, the atoms will compose flexible chains,
such as those that form the "backbones" of plastic polymers
(carbon) and of synthetic rubbers, or silicones (silicon). These two
elements are unique in their tendency to bond chemically to form geometrically
defined matrices and chains. This shared habit might predispose them
to interact cooperatively, given the right conditions.
A natural
nanotechnology, or cell factory, needs an energy source, and a means of
directing energy precisely to shepherd chemical reactions up against the
thermodynamic gradient through levels of increasing chemical complexity,
away from equilibrium. It has to be able to catalyze organic reactions
to build macromolecules and provide a physical structure to hold organic
molecules in place during their assembly into cellular substructures.
Given these
criteria, silicon tops the list of potential facilitators for the organic
synthesis of living cells. Silicon naturally bonds with various metals
to form a variety of periodic and aperiodic crystalline forms. Silicate
crystals potentially could serve as templates during organic synthesis.
Nucleic acids and proteins in their crystalline forms could handily interlock
with silicate crystals in secure arrangements during their assembly into
larger structures. (Crystallography remains a primary laboratory technique
for determining the structures of proteins. It is the methodology that
was used to determine the double helix structure of DNA.)
Silicon
also has photoelectric properties; it can convert light into electricity.
The solar-energy industry exploits the photovoltaic properties of silicates.
As a result, silicon potentially solves the problem of converting starlight
into electricity to drive organic synthesis. Some silicon crystals also
possess piezoelectric properties. Under pressure, they generate an electric
current. Phonograph needles exploit this effect. Piezoelectric effects
provide another potential source of energy for a silicate-based cell factory.
"But
at [the end of the fifteenth century] nature was still regarded
as a living organism, and the relation between nature and man was
conceived in terms of astrology and magic; for man’s mastery
of nature was conceived not as the mastery of mind over mechanism
but as the mastery of one soul over another soul, which implied
magic; and the outermost or stellar sphere was still conceived
in Aristotelian fashion as the purest and most eminently living
or active or influential part of the cosmic organism, and therefore
as the source of all events happening in the other parts; hence
astrology."
—
R.
G. Collingwood
The
Idea of Nature
Biogenesis
Through Silicate-Managed Nanotech
Silicates
also have a capacity to catalyze organic synthesis. Certain chemical
reactions that build complex organic molecules from simpler ones occur
more readily in the presence of certain silicate minerals. Clay-catalyzed
RNA synthesis, for example, has been demonstrated in the research of
James Ferris at New York’s
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (see http://www.origins.rpi.edu/chem_pubs.html#ferris.
Tim Tyler has posted a bibliography of references to silicate-mediated
organic synthesis at http://originoflife.net/links/index.html).
NASA researchers Hugh Hill and Joseph Nuth similarly have demonstrated
the ability of amorphous iron and magnesium silicates to catalyze
a variety of organic molecules from a gas mixture containing only
carbon monoxide, nitrogen and hydrogen.
As to where
a silicate-managed nanotechnology might operate in nature, it turns out
that all of the necessary ingredients are at hand in what astronomers
call "the local interstellar cloud," which is the cloud of gas
and dust particles in which our solar system is embedded. The most abundant
element in the cloud, as throughout the universe, is hydrogen, the starting
material from which stars manufacture all other elements. Next in abundance
in the local cloud are the elements carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen, the
primary building blocks of organic chemistry—and silicon, magnesium,
and iron, potentially suitable materials from which nature could construct
nanotech assembly lines for the mass production of biological cells.
"What
is Life but the continual resolution of the antimony of the diverse
by the spasm of Love under Will, that is, by the constantly explosive,
the orgiastic, perception of Truth, the dissolution of dividuality in one
radiant star of Truth that ever revolveth, and goeth, and filleth the Heavens
with Light?"
—
Aleister
Crowley
Truth, in Little
Essays Toward Truth
From observations
of young stars of intermediate size, so-called Herbig Ae stars, which
resemble the sun in its infancy, and from observations of the known contents
of comets, Hill and Nuth propose that, when solar systems form inside
cooling stellar nebulae, silicate grains catalyze simple organic reactions
to produce a variety of prebiotic organic molecules. The prevailing scientific
model of interstellar grains, based on spectrographic analysis, is of
carbonate
shells covering silicate nuclei. These reactions require the heat
and pressures found near the protostar. The grains, coated with simple
organics, then are transported by a "circulatory system" of
material flowing from the center of the nebula out to a distance typical
of that at which comets are thought to form. (The research by Nuth, Hill,
and colleagues appears in Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIIII [2002],
and see the paper "Protostars
are Nature's Chemical Factories," by Nuth and Johnson in Lunar
and Planetary Science XXXVI [2005]. A summary of this research is provided
in "Constraints
on Nebular Dynamics and Chemistry Based on Observations of Annealed Magnesium
Silicate Grains in Comets and in Disks Surrounding Herbig Ae/Be Stars",
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 98, No. 5, Feb.
27, 2001, 2182-2187.)
NASA's
Stardust mission, which in 2004 captured and returned to Earth dust
from the comet Wild 2, provided
additional corroborating evidence of such silicate transport processes.
And isotope
analysis provides additional evidence. The cometary dust included
silicate crystals that could form only in the innermost regions of the
solar system and that then must have been transported to more peripheral,
colder regions, where they were incorporated into comets. At later
stages in a developing solar system, when planets are forming, the
characteristic silicate material identifiable in the circumstellar
dust includes a greater proportion of crystalline (as opposed to
amorphous) silicates, and the organic content of the dust comprises
increasingly complex molecules.
This suggests a two-step process, in which simple organics are
catalyzed near the protostar, then transported to cooler regions for
further, more precise processing. The second step relies on crystalline
silicates.
Nasa's Spitzer Space Telescope has revealed similar
processes operating in other galaxies.
Because
crystallization on Earth is subject to sedimentation and the turbulence
of convection currents, the semiconductor industry continues to work
with NASA to investigate silicon crystallization in space. In weightlessness,
silicon crystals can be grown larger and with greater purity—geometrical
regularity—than they can on Earth. This effect suggests that
the manufacturing of viruses and bacteria in space could occur on
a massive, cosmic scale. And radiation
conditions in space might be responsible for biochemistry's homochirality.
Darwin's
hypothetical "small warm pond" in which he imagined life arose,
may be a less fitting image than that of a "big cold cloud."
In summary,
the star larvae hypothesis tightens the scientific model of biological
origins by proposing
- Specific
physical mechanisms: 1. crystalline silicate templates or "scaffolding" to
hold in place partially assembled macromolecules, 2. silicate catalysis
of organic chemistry, 3. a source of (electrical) energy available
to molecular-scale assemblies.
- Specific
material agents driving the mechanisms: amorphous and crystalline silicate
minerals.
- Specific
locations where the agents are observed to commingle with organic material:
cooling stellar/planetary nebulae.

The
Star Larvae Hypothesis:
Stars constitute
a genus of organism.
The stellar life cycle includes a larval phase.
Biological life constitutes the larval phase of the stellar life cycle.
Elaboration: The
hypothesis presents a teleological model of nature, in which
Text
Copyright ©2004-2012 Advanced Theological Systems. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Statement: We use third-party advertising companies to
serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not
including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits
to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and
services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice
and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies,
visit the Google ad and content
network privacy policy.
|