Star Larvae Hypothesis
Nature's Plan for Humankind
Part 1. Metabolic Metaphysics
Metabolism and the Complexity-Entropy Circuit
and entropy—anabolic and catabolic processes—feed
each other through circuits collectively
called metabolism. Nature's
metabolism encompasses the organic and the inorganic
in a continuum of anabolic and catabolic exchanges.
characterize the universe as running down, heading toward equilibrium,
or maximum entropy, but that observation accounts only partially for nature's doings.
describes the catabolic leg of nature’s metabolism, the tendency away
from equilibrium—anabolism—essentially the subject matter
theory, which is just as apparent. And the linking of the two tendencies, anabolism and catabolism,
into the higher-order concept of metabolism plants biological thinking at the foundation of the physical world.
Kabbalists went so far as to try symbolically to diagram reality
or, as it were, the divine psyche itself. They envisioned a sefirotic tree.
We today are more comfortable with the double helix of DNA or the unified
field theory of modern physics, but they're all fundamentally the same:
one awesomely integrated organism."
— Lawrence Kushner
Way into the Jewish Mystical Tradition
the concept highlights the feedback relationships and interdependencies
among nature's varied processes. The building-up
(anabolic/anti-entropic) and tearing down (catabolic/entropic) processes
of metabolism feed each other. Each leg of the circuit receives as input
the output of the other: complexity grows from unorganized raw material,
and entropy turns organized complexity back into unorganized
raw material. The processes enlist one another to create circuits,
which stabilize the whole of nature and give
that whole an organic quality.
the early Greeks quite simply, and with some qualification
for all Greeks whatever, nature was a vast living organism,
consisting of a material body spread out in space and permeated
by movements in time; the whole body was endowed with life,
so that all its movements were vital movements; and all these
movements were purposive, directed by intellect. This living
and thinking body was homogenous throughout in the sense that
it was all alive, all endowed with soul and with reason; it
was non-homogeneous in the sense that different parts of it
were made of different substances each having its own specialized
qualitative nature and mode of acting. The problems which so
profoundly exercise modern thought, the problem of the relation
between dead matter and living matter, and the problem of the
relation between matter and mind, did not exist. There was
no dead matter, for no difference of principle was recognized
between the seasonal rotation of the heavens and the seasonal
growth and fall of leaves on a tree, or between the movement
of a planet in the sky and the movement of a fish in the water;
it was never for a moment suggested that the one could be accounted
for by a kind of law which did not even begin to account for
— R. G. Collingwood
Idea of Nature
in this general sense enables natural forms to persist in states that
are far from equilibrium for extended periods. If complexity theory
and the second law of thermodynamics describe essential tendencies
of nature, from the largest to the smallest physical systems and from the slowest to the quickest processes and spanning
the organic-inorganic divide, then nature’s essential activity
must be metabolic. Her essential process is metabolism.
organisms that populate the Earth are the metabolic systems
that are easiest for scientists to observe in detail, because their
behaviors occur on scales near the human scale. But complexity theory
demonstrates that nature manufactures self-organizing systems that operate on very different scales—spatially and temporally.
The scientific understanding of atomic and galactic processes, for example, is necessarily
less exact than the understanding of biological processes, because
biology is so much nearer at hand. Scientists can get a solid handle on events
that occur on scales from inches to miles and from seconds to decades.
Grasping events that occur on scales of angstroms or light years and
picoseconds or eons poses a greater challenge. For this reason, as research capacities develop, observers might expect the discourse across scientific disciplines to converge
on biological language.
for example, actively maintains its characteristic chemical and thermal
conditions so as to retain a biosphere that is suitable for life. In
other words, it behaves like an organism—metabolically. This characterization of
the Earth constitutes, in broad terms, the Gaia hypothesis of James Lovelock. The British
scientist proposes that the Earth is suitable for life because life
itself, through chemical feedback loops that operate across ecosystems,
stabilizes the chemistry of the atmosphere and oceans (see Lovelock’s Gaia:
A New Look at Life on Earth). The Earth’s biosphere is a collection of interdependent, interlocking
processes of material and energy recycling that cooperate to keep the
terrestrial environment fit for life. The processes of entropy—decay,
deterioration, breakdown—the processes that liberate materials
and the complimentary processes of construction, building up, and organization
are discernible within the Gaian body.
is melting in nature. We think we see objects, but our eyes
are slow and partial. Nature is blooming and withering in long,
puffy respirations, rising and falling in oceanic wave-motion.
A mind that opened itself fully to nature without sentimental
preconception would be glutted by nature's coarse materialism,
its relentless superfluity. An apple tree laden with fruit:
how peaceful, how picturesque. But remove the rosy filter of
humanism from our gaze and look again. See nature spurning
and frothing, its mad spermatic bubbles endlessly spilling
out and smashing in that inhuman round of waste, rot, and carnage."
— Camille Paglia
Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson
Gaia as being in a state of stable disequilibrium. Gaia operates
far from equilibrium, not in a haphazard way with wild fluctuations,
but with remarkable stability. For what now has been at least three billion
years, the conditions of Earth have remained within the narrow chemical
and thermal range that has enabled life to proliferate and evolve to
its present state of complexity. Lovelock lists ranges of specific physical
conditions within which Gaia must remain to survive as a living entity.
A slight decrease in the proportion of oxygen in the atmosphere, for
example, would suffocate all but the most anaerobic forms of life. A
slight increase in oxygen level, and the planet’s surface would incinerate. Similarly with other
gases in the atmosphere and with the chemical composition of the oceans.
Earth's chemistry is finely tuned to keep life alive. Lovelock suggests
that biology maintains the Earth’s stable disequilibrium within
the narrow bio-friendly range of physical conditions through the use of
feedback controls. Tendencies toward imbalance in the proportions of gasses
in the atmosphere, for example, are met with changes in the planetary
metabolism—increases or decreases in oceanic algae production, for
example—that redress the imbalance.
and its biosphere constitute a spontaneously self-organizing complex
system. The carbon cycle, the nitrogen cycle, and similar recyclings
of materials that operate globally, taken collectively, constitute
a planetary metabolism. Similarly, galaxies seem to regulate their
rates of star formation by means of material feedback loops. Galaxies
seem to possess natural regulatory processes that precisely control
the distribution of matter and energy within them as well as controlling
their exchanges of matter with the intergalactic medium. Apparently, like organisms and planetary biospheres,
galaxies persist for long periods in a state of stable disequilibrium,
something that they are able to do by using means strikingly similar
to those used by organisms and other kinds of self-organizing systems.
(For an overview of the metabolism and ecology of galaxies, see "The Gas Between the Stars," by
Ronald J. Reynolds, Scientific American, January 2002.)
Similar dynamics might apply to the universe as a whole. The universal trend so
far at least has been one of increasing complexity arising in nature
as time passes, from the near homogeneity of the first seconds that followed
the Big Bang to the countless arrangements of matter that constitute the
mature galaxies, solar systems, the terrestrial biosphere, and the cities
and ecosystems that ornament the Earth's surface and potentially those
of other planets. The implication is that the universe is still in an
active growing phase, part of a life cycle that began with a bang and
might end with a whimper, but sustained during its lifetime by bogglingly
complex and interwoven metabolic processes of self-organizing complexity.
of looking at nature, putting biological notions in the center of the
conceptual map, is atavistic. It recalls ancient, archaic conceptions
of nature, in which the cosmos was conceived as being a living environment—as
being alive in its motions, ensouled. The most primitive religious conception
of nature apparently was one in which every discernible natural process
was seen to be alive, or at least to participate in animate processes. The idea that nature at its fundaments is
nonliving and that life is a local aberration moving in the "wrong"
direction (away from entropy), is a very modern conception of nature and
of biology’s place in nature, and this concept has helped alienate
the modern mind from nature. The alienation has gained steam steadily since
the Enlightenment, but now it might be waning as ecological issues force
themselves on the consciousness of the industrialized world.
conception (of nature as a whole and in all of its parts constituting
living processes) was revived in modern times by a small number of philosophers,
including mathematician Alfred North Whitehead. He placed the concept of organism at
the center of his understanding of nature. For Whitehead, the concept
of organism superceded attributes of organic and inorganic and ultimately
even the concepts of objectivity and subjectivity. Organism is the fundamental
unit of natural organization, in his philosophy, of those things that
actually exist. It is the organizational pattern and process of being/becoming.
argued that the constituents of reality are events, or occurrences,
rather than things. The fundamental units of actuality come into being,
incorporating influences from the past; they take place, then they pass
into the past. They influence their descendents just as they are influenced by their ancestors. This notion formed the basis of Whitehead's
metaphysics, which he called the philosophy of organism. He summarized
the view in Science
and the Modern World:
point is that a further stage of provisional realism is required
in which the scientific scheme is recast, and founded upon the ultimate
concept of organism. [. . . . ] The concept of the order of nature
is bound up with the concept of nature as the locus of organisms
in the process of development."
Taoist yin-yang symbol, represents the harmonization of opposites
into a unity—as of anabolism and
catabolism into metabolism—as
a metaphysical principle, an archetype of dynamic feedback processes that underlies the forms of the physical world.
problem is one of cellular psychology, sociology, or ecology, and
then of molecular psychology and ecology. Finally, everything is
a matter of individual and social psychology, on we know not how
— Charles Hartshorne
Logic of Perfection
human being is a relatively small organism, with a chemical metabolism.
A galaxy is a relatively large organism, with a nuclear-gravitational
metabolism. The star larvae hypothesis proposes that the concepts and
language of biology apply generally to nature and, if substituted for
the concepts and language of complexity theory and thermodynamics,
provide a unifying perspective from which to view nature’s operations
on any scale and across scales.
physiology, anatomy, development, descent, symbiosis, parasitism, mutation,
metamorphosis, ecology, evolution, and other concepts from biology
might more usefully describe, than do the vocabularies of thermodynamics and complexity
theory, what occurs in nature—in and among atoms, molecules,
crystals, bacteria, humans and their societies, ecosystems, planetary
biospheres, solar systems, galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, and
whatever other organismic structures and processes the universe might
produce. What, for example, has the study of stars revealed?
That stars are born, that they progress through distinct developmental
stages, and that finally they die. And that this life cycle is powered
by a nuclear metabolism (building up [fusion] processes and tearing down
[fission] processes feeding each other). (A peculiarity of astronomy is the use of the entrenched term, "stellar evolution," when what is meant is "stellar development" as it pertains to a stellar life cycle.) Even given the difficulties inherent
in studying galaxies, the latest theories propose that the many forms of
galaxies represent particular stages of a generalized galactic life cycle
and that the internal processes of galaxies, such as star formation, are
controlled by feedback cycles. Astrophysicist Lee Smolin has proposed that
parent universes beget baby universes and that universes
evolve by natural selection. As much as scientific fundamentalists might
resist applying the language of livingness to anything outside of biology,
dismissing such applications as metaphorical, the biological shoe nonetheless seems
deep ordering principle—the general applicability of biological
relationships and operations—expresses itself also through the structures
and processes of human industry. The industries of human enterprise,
no less than those of bees or beavers, ought not be considered an
anomalous or unnatural development.
Life is not a fluke in the physical world, an unlikely localized countertrend
to the iron law of entropy, and neither is its industry. Life, as
a tendency to metabolize, to interweave catabolism and anabolism, drives the forms of
the physical world, both the terrestrial and the extraterrestrial,
the organic and the inorganic, the "natural" and the "engineered." Growth
and decay alike are local phenomena, always occurring within the context
of and subordinate to, a superordinate metabolism. Nature in this view
is defined as a nested hierarchy of organism-ecologies, in which the
discernible units, the stable disequilibria, function simultaneously
as organisms that participate in ecologies and as ecologies constituted
of subordinate organisms. In a seamless web.
NEXT > Organism
Star Larvae Hypothesis:
a genus of organism.
The stellar life cycle includes a larval phase.
Biological life constitutes the larval phase of the stellar life cycle.
hypothesis presents a teleological model of nature, in which
Social Media =
Home | Blog | About | Videos | Contact | Text
Copyright ©2004-2017 Advanced Theological Systems. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Statement: We use third-party advertising companies to
serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not
including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits
to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and
services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice
and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies,
visit the Google ad and content