The
Star Larvae Hypothesis
|
By maintaining itself in a state of stable disequilibrium, a galaxy exhibits an essential characteristic of a living organism.
However, as eager as Gribbin is to classify the Milky Way as an organism, he is less charitable when it comes to individual stars. As dynamic and lively as they are in terms of their internal processes, stars themselves do not qualify as living things, he contends. "The life processes that create and maintain the spiral structure in disk galaxies start with stars," he acknowledges, and he admits that stars possess a trait distinctive of living things: "A star like our sun is itself, of course, in a state far from equilibrium." But we should not be misled by that fact: "Not even the keenest enthusiast for the Gaia hypothesis would argue that the sun is alive in the way that the Earth and the Milky Way are alive, because the sun is doing the best it can to reach equilibrium."
"The most useful tool astronomers have for studying the way
stars change as they age is called the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, after
the two astronomers who pioneered its use. Stars live for so long and change
so slowly, by and large, that there is no hope of studying stellar evolution
by watching an individual star or two age. But the H-R diagram enables
astronomers to do the equivalent of a botanist who studies a forest of
trees that includes seedlings, saplings, and mature specimens and uses
those studies to work out the life cycle of a tree."
—
John Gribbin
Blinded
By the Light
Gribbin’s dismissive characterization reveals a bias common in the scientific view. The sun and all the other stars may be succumbing to entropy—rolling down the slope of potential energy toward equilibrium—despite their best efforts, just as are all of us who find ourselves past midlife and continuing to age. But stars exhibit such a striking number of characteristics associated with living organisms, including self regulation through feedback control, that a reconsideration seems justified. The star larvae hypothesis extends the notion of being alive specifically and explicitly to stars.
The case for the lives of stars relies on the similarity between the processes that drive biology and those that drive stellar physics. Animals maintain themselves in a far-from-equilibrium state by releasing chemical energy from the nutrients that they consume. Stars maintain themselves by releasing nuclear energy from the atomic nuclei that they consume. Like organisms, stars use the released energy to maintain their bodily structures in a state of stable disequilibrium
Stellar metabolism consists of interwoven processes of nuclear fusion (anabolic) and fission (catabolic) reactions that maintain the gross structures and processes of stellar anatomy and physiology. Newborn stars consume hydrogen nuclei (unattached protons), exclusively. The processes that fuse these protons into the nuclei of the other atoms occur by various, specific routes. Inside stars, nuclear reactions, such as the proton-proton chain, the triple alpha process, and the CNO cycle, build up the larger atomic nuclei, in steps, from individual protons. The general term for this process is nucleosynthesis.
The proportions of the various nuclear reactions relative to one another varies with the age of a star, a situation that parallels metabolic changes that occur in organisms during development. A newborn star fuses individual protons into proton pairs, which are the nuclei of helium atoms. This hydrogen burning process dominates nucleosynthesis in young stars. Eventually too few free protons remain to keep the process going, but sufficient numbers of helium nuclei have been created for the star to shift into a hotter, helium-burning phase. This nucleosynthetic process fuses helium nuclei into carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and other larger atoms. Eventually a star will burn carbon and larger atoms and produce yet larger ones, with iron defining the upper size limit of atoms that are formed through the metabolic processes that dominate the life of a typical star. Shorter-lived but more energetic processes are responsible for producing atoms heavier than iron. These processes take place during the explosive, high-energy events that constitute the death throes of a star.
In
a star bigger than the sun, a peculiar thing happens during the hydrogen
burning phase. If the particle cloud from which the star condensed
includes enough carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, the star will initiate a
mode of hydrogen burning called the CNO cycle, in which it fuses hydrogen
nuclei into helium nuclei through a catalytic process. Catalysis is a
transformative process that organic metabolisms use to manage their chemical
resources. Catalysis relies on intermediaries that participate in reactions
but emerge unchanged. An example from biology is the use of enzymes. Certain
kinds of enzymes will bond to particular molecules, introduce those molecules
to others, then detach themselves from the molecules that they have joined,
unchanged by the reaction.
During
the catalytic CNO cycle, isotopes of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen exchange
protons and emit subatomic particles through radioactive decay in a specific
sequence of transformations that yields helium from an initial union
of hydrogen and carbon. Each time a helium nucleus is emitted from the
process it leaves behind the original carbon isotope, which is then free
to bond with another hydrogen nucleus—proton—and begin
the cycle again. The process is a true catalysis. When the manufactured
helium is released, the initiator of the process is regenerated to begin
the cycle again.
Notice the elements involved in the CNO cycle: carbon, nitrogen,
and oxygen, interacting with hydrogen. This group of elements, sometimes
designated by the abbreviation CHON, constitutes up to 90 percent of the
mass of biological protoplasm. It is surely a strange coincidence that
this small set of elements plays starring roles in the catalytic metabolisms
of both biological organisms and stars. A priori, there is no
reason to think that their nuclear and chemical properties would link
them in such a way. The star larvae hypothesis sees in the coincidence
a family resemblance.
But a complex metabolism is just one attribute that stars share with organic life. Stars also possess an internal arrangement of dynamically interacting subsystems by means of which, or in the service of which, the metabolism proceeds. These subsystems constitute the anatomy of the star. The material and energetic exchanges among the subsystems constitute a star’s physiology.
A star is not a homogeneous blob of hot gas. It is an organized structure of discernable components arranged and interacting with one another in definite ways. The sun, as a typical example, comprises, anatomically, an inner core within which nucleosynthesis occurs, a radiative layer that carries energy out from the core by radiation, and a convective layer that carries the energy further by convection. This onionlike structure continues outward from the core to the periphery with the photosphere, the chromosphere, and, at the outer fringes, the diffuse corona.
| Metabolisms are nuclear and chemical, stellar and biological. |
This layered body plan is maintained dynamically by a system of physiological processes. The photosphere, for example, includes structures that solar physicists call granules, which are the tops of convection cells that cover the sun. The convection cells underlying the granules constitute a circulatory system that shuttles material between the interior and the surface of the solar body. At the surface the fluid material circulates according to multiple flow components (rotation, cellular convection, oscillations, and meridional flows).The granules themselves compose supergranules, whose fluid motions concentrate magnetic fields to produce a weblike pattern of field lines—the chromospheric network—that continually evolves over the sun’s surface. The photospheric circulatory system includes magnetic field markers—the familiar sunspots—and the smaller, brighter spots called faculae. A system of interlocking processes is at work here to maintain a discernable, complex structure in a state of stable disequilibrium and that exhibits a level of complexity suggestive of a living—organic—system.
And, as with
biological systems, a star's internal processes are cyclic. Physiological
cycles of organisms include the familiar respiratory, estrus, and circadian
rhythms of animals. Gaia, too, pulses according to interwoven rhythms:
tidal, seasonal, glacial, and other. The sun exhibits the same tendency.
Its rhythms include the well-studied eleven-year
sunspot cycle, along with a 76-year oscillation in its volume. NASA’s
orbiting SoHo observatory during the 1990s revealed a rapid five-minute
cycle of helioseismographic activity—of sound waves resonating
through the body of the sun (for details, see "Solar
and Stellar Activity Cycles" by
Peter R. Wilson).
"The
Rosicrucians and the Illuminati, describing the angels, archangels,
and other celestial creatures, declared that they resembled small suns,
being centers of radiant energy surrounded by streamers of Vrilic force.
From these ourpouring streamers of force is derived the popular belief
that angels have wings. These wings are corona-like fans of light, by means
of which the celestial creatures propel themselves through the subtle essences
of the superphysical worlds."
-—
Manley Palmer Hall
The
Secret Teachings of All Ages
Stars and biological organisms also depend on feedback to achieve homeostasis, or internal stability. The sun uses feedback controls specifically to maintain its internal temperature, which must remain within a limited range to keep it viable. If the sun were to cool excessively, it would implode under its own gravity. If it were to heat up excessively, it would fly apart. The sun keeps blazing because its tendency to expand—an effect of its heat—is countered precisely by its tendency to contract—an effect of its gravity. The temperature range that balances these two countervailing forces happily corresponds to the range that keeps nucleosynthesis proceeding in the required orderly fashion.
Stellar reproduction
is addressed, ostensibly, by the standard scientific model of the stellar "life
cycle."
When stars die, they do so explosively, expelling much of their bodily
material into the space around them. The death leaves behind a dense core,
which persists as a brown dwarf, neutron star, or black hole, depending
on the size of the original star. The material that is ejected enriches
the nearby interstellar clouds, from which new stars form. This recycling
of material from one generation of stars to the next resembles reproduction.
But it resembles the fertilization of roots more than it does
the production of seeds. It is an incomplete reproductive cycle.
The seeds of stars are unattached protons. The recycling of material from
old stars into new ones does not produce new unattached protons.
The star
larvae hypothesis proposes that stars reproduce in a way that more nearly
resembles biological reproduction, insofar as the stellar reproductive
cycle is divisible into discernable stages, all of which participate in
the succession of stellar generations.
The hypothesis proposes that the stellar body is the adult phase of a
developmental program that includes a larval phase. Like some biological
larvae, star larvae bear little resemblance to their adult forms. The
larval phase of the stellar life cycle unfolds on planetary surfaces.
The developing larvae exploit the material resources of their planets,
and the larval population eventually differentiates to produce a type,
which on Earth calls itself Homo sapiens, that is uniquely adapted
(programmed) to carry the stellar life cycle into its next phase. This
avant-garde type rapidly converts the material resources of the planet
into complex environments—cities. It develops
symbiotically with its evolving technologies as it does so and becomes highly
domesticated—neotenous. Eventually, the complex
symbiotic environments are manufactured in the orbital space around the
incubator planet, enabling the larvae to occupy
a new—extraterrestrial, weightless—ecological niche and
commence the next stage of the stellar life cycle.
Researchers, called anthropologists, who study the habits of
Homo sapiens testify to a peculiar behavior that betrays an intuition
of the metamorphosis to come. As if by precognition, the larvae fashion
images of themselves as glowing and airborne. Larval
lore points to the sky as the abode of "enlightened" fellows,
a place and condition to which larval institutions called religions
admonish adherents to aspire. While the drive to join the celestial
illuminati of myth expresses itself through religious art and lore, the
drive to join the celestial illuminati of the physical sky—the stars—expresses
itself through aerospace
engineering.
NEXT > Astrolatry,
Astrotheology and Astral Religion

Solar/stellar Anatomy from CWRU -- http://burro.cwru.edu/Academics/
![]()
The Star Larvae Hypothesis:
Stars constitute a genus of organism. The stellar life cycle includes a larval phase. Biological life constitutes the larval phase of the stellar life cycle.
Elaboration: The hypothesis presents a teleological model of nature, in which
|
|
||
Text Copyright ©2004-2012 Advanced Theological Systems. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Statement: We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, visit the Google ad and content network privacy policy.