In the case of industrial civilization, the distinction
between the organic critter and the inorganic environment can shrink to
imperceptibility. Consider implantable medical devices. On a broader scale,
industry fashions the urban environment largely from inorganic materials:
metal, glass, concrete, ceramics, silicon circuitry, and other innovations
of material engineering. Humankind operates on a metabolic continuum with
these inorganic materials. Clean categorical distinctions between organism
and artifact become harder to maintain as technology evolves ever more
intimate relationships with the human body.
During the
eighteenth century, industrialization grabbed the attention and the economies
of the Western world, and the outpouring of inventions inspired novel
philosophies. The French philosopher La Mettrie perceived a similarity
between human beings and the new devices. He intuited the metabolic continuum.
But La Mettrie took the mechanistic mode to be nature’s default
and the organic to be a special instance, as did Descartes. La Mettrie
extended Descartes' view and reduced even the mind to just another mechanical
process of the body. In 1748 he wrote "Man
a Machine",
in which he presented his mechanistic philosophy. He categorized animals
of all types, including human beings, as complicated mechanical devices.
Biological life seemed to be nothing more than a type of machinery—of
a high order but nevertheless reducible to mechanics, hydraulics, pneumatics,
and so forth. No metaphysical souls or Cartesian "mental substance"
necessary.
La Mettrie
did not use the term intelligent design in the context of nature's
machinery, but the implication for theology is there. La Mettrie took
the opposite tack and promoted an intellectual fashion that became hostile
toward God. Mechanistic philosophy gained prominence in the wake of the
Enlightenment; it accepted natural law as a first (and only) cause but
extended its application to cover the biological world. In the intervening
years this view has served as ontological bedrock for the modern secular
mindset, giving us behaviorism, a mechanistic approach to medicine, and
the schism between science and religion. But in its early years it provided
freethinkers with an alternative to church dogma, such as the doctrine
that humankind is a divine creation. It gave us humankind as natural machine,
its ultimate origins, albeit, still a mystery. Darwin later cemented the
link between natural law and human origins.
More recently,
during the 1960s, La Mettrie's model was stood on its head. Marshall McLuhan
also intuited the metabolic continuum. But he made the case that machines,
properly understood, are the imitations, or extensions, of capacities
of the human body—not Man A Machine but Machine A Man.
McLuhan’s book "The
Mechanical Bride"
is a kind of anti-sequel to La Mettrie's "Man A Machine."
The phrase mechanical bride refers to the libidinal appeal of
machinery and commercial culture’s exploitation of that appeal.
The postwar advertising culture that McLuhan analyzed embraced commercial
machinery, and the family car was the star of the show. The advertisers
sold cars by conspicuously juxtaposing engineering achievements with female
anatomy. McLuhan points out that a perhaps less visible but nonetheless
identifiable trend was the complementary tendency to use technological
jargon and blueprint-type graphics to advertise female undergarments.
McLuhan had discovered a place in the modern unconscious that conflates
sexual allure with the seductive powers of technology. This psychology
seemed to him to be a natural adaptation to the evolving relationship
between urbanites and their gadgets, the collections of extensions of
bodies that constitutes homes. Electricity, in McLuhan's analysis, adds
a psychical extension of sensory and mental faculties to the mechanical
extensions of muscle and bone. Hence, his concept of the "global
village" in which everybody knows everything about everybody else.
Digital photos of private events taken with cameraphones and posted instantly
to web sites that are accessible worldwide secures McLuhan's prophetic
status.
McLuhan and La Mettrie both perceived organic qualities inherent in technology,
but each adopted a different view as to which was the original—the
organic or the technological—and which was imitation. But in a feedback
cycle starting points are arbitrary. Just as the nonliving hair that covers
a human head can be said to enjoy a symbiotic relationship with the organism
from which it sprouts, and to which it presumably confers some adaptive
advantage, technologies are symbiotic with the organisms from which they
sprout and to which they confer adaptive advantage. The critter and its
environment, especially its manufactured environment, are inextricable.
In the biological
world, symbiosis among organisms enables the participants to overcome
environmental circumstances and expand into new territorial niches. Technologies
deliver the same capacity. The orbital space around Earth, for example,
gradually is opening up as an ecological niche for human habitation as
a result of human symbiosis with technology.
"Build
a road, clear the path, remove all roadblocks from my People's path!
For thus says the high and lofty One who inhabits eternity, whose
name is Holy."
-- Isaiah 57:14
Locating
technology in the context of symbiosis undermines the notion that human
inventions are inherently antithetical or detrimental to nature. They
take on the character rather of functional extensions of the human organism,
as McLuhan saw. And as such they are natural extensions of the metabolic
processes of the human body and human society. McLuhan grasped the nature
of the relationship, observing in "Understanding
Media,"
"Physiologically,
man in the normal use of technology (or his variously extended body)
is perpetually modified by it and in turn finds ever new ways of modifying
his technology. Man becomes, as it were, the sex organs of the machine
world, as the bee of the plant world, enabling it to fecundate and to
evolve ever new forms."
Biologist
Richard Dawkins complements and extends McLuhan's thinking with his notion
of "the extended phenotype." In the book of that title Dawkins
examines various instances of animal industry, such as the dam building
of beavers, nest building of birds, and pebble-house building of an insect
called the caddis fly. Presumably—and naturally this is clearest
in the case of insects—these animals do not learn from instruction
by experts how to go about building their various artifacts. The genes
that guide their behaviors instruct them. Dawkins makes the case that
animal-built structures enhance the adaptive advantage of the creatures
that build them and, like McLuhan, characterizes the structures as functional
extensions of the bodies of the builders. Dawkins comments in "The
Extended Phenotype,"
"The
house of a caddis strictly is not a part of its cellular body, but it
does fit snugly round the body. If the body is regarded as a gene vehicle,
or survival machine, it is easy to see the stone house as a kind of
extra protective wall, in a functional sense the outer part of the vehicle.
It just happens to be made of stone rather than chitin."
The adaptive
unit just happens to be made of inorganic material. Its relationship to
its builder transcends the distinction between the organic and the inorganic
and challenges any neat delineation of the organism distinct from its
environment.
The family life of the beaver is adapted to an environment that beavers
manufacture from sticks and mud and a rudimentary sense of architecture.
Certain ants manage the environments of underground "farms"
in which they plant spores of and harvest as crops certain fungi. Homo
sapiens mines the Earth for ores and hydrocarbons and builds shopping
malls and space stations. Species then adapt to the circumstances that
their own handiwork imposes on them. Technologies participate fundamentally
in the dynamics of organic life and its evolution, because technologies
bestow an adaptive advantage onto the genes that guide the behaviors from
which the technologies result. The technologies participate in a feedback
loop with organic critters. The indivisible evolutionary unit of a technological
species is the unit of organism-technology symbiosis. Sociobiologist Edward
O. Wilson rendered essentially the same concept in terms of "gene-culture
coevolution."
"The
artificial purification of all milieus, atmospheres, and environments
will supplant the failing internal immune systems. If these immune
systems are breaking down it is because an irreversible tendency
called progress pushes the human body and spirit into relinquishing
its systems of defense and self-determination, only to replace them
with technical artifacts. Divested of his defenses, man becomes
eminently vulnerable to science."
Urban humanity
rests on an accommodating technological infrastructure that delivers countless
adaptive adjuncts to the human organism: waste disposal, temperature control,
antibiotics, processed foods . . . to begin a list. Electrical energy
grids make viable human population densities that would be unthinkable
off-grid. Domesticated urbanites have become inseparable from their collective
artifacts, or anatomical and psychological extensions, to which they have
become adapted and within which they continue to evolve.
So where is encapsulated urban humanity headed, with its industrial mass
potentially straining Gaia's homeostatic feedback system? Biology provides
a set of concepts that we can use to recast the problem in terms of a
natural evolutionary juncture: Technology is humankind's symbiotic partner
in managing a migration, a birth, and a metamorphosis. The human-technology
symbiosis is preparing to shepherd a human migration, midwife a Gaian
delivery, and complete the encapsulation process that provides biology's
photoelectrochemical metabolism with a suitable environment within which
to metamorphose, or mutate, into a gravitational-nuclear metabolism.